What a Fool Believes

Michael McDonald & Kenny Loggins (1978)[1]

 Growing up in the 70’s, The Doobie Brothers’ music was always on in our house, and the song, “What a Fool Believes,” was one of their biggest hits. Futile belief, regardless of facts right in front of us, is foolish, and is what this song tells us.

This “fool” runs into his former flame and sees only what he wants to see – that he somehow thinks she still cares about him, or ever did. He is indeed a fool, and regardless of the information, or even his own instinct, he believes in something that is clearly not true.

When it comes to investing, very often we choose the narrative we believe, whether bullish or bearish, and regardless of the facts, we can even choose to see whatever we want. Magnificent 7, Artificial Intelligence, and a Fed cut all feed the bullish narrative; election results, high P/E’s, and recession fears feed the bearish narrative.

He came from somewhere back in her long ago

The sentimental fool don’t see

Tryin’ hard to recreate what had yet to be recreated once in her life

She musters a smile for his nostalgic tale

Never coming near what he wanted to say

Only to realize it never really was

She had a place in his life

He never made her think twice

As he rises to her apology

Anybody else would surely know

He’s watching her go

But what a fool believes, he sees

No wise man has the power to reason away

What seems to be is always better than nothing

Than nothing at all

Anybody else would surely know” – This man is clearly in denial and can’t (or won’t) see what is right in front of him, even as she “musters a smile.” He is trying to create “what had yet to be created.” Investing is like this as well, as we all are trying to determine future outcomes.  But let’s be clear: the fool isn’t the one who determined future outcomes incorrectly. The fool is the one who ignores the facts staring them in the face.

Data First: What facts do we see in front of us that shouldn’t be ignored?

Growing up in Chicago, Euchre was also a big part of our home life, with many life lessons learned at the card table. One of the more important lessons: if you don’t know who the sucker is, it’s probably you. There is a sucker in this market, and one day we will all see who it is (and it might be me, so here we go).

My mind goes back to 2008 or 1998 right about now, and what the narrative was in those environments. I realize the financial entertainment media says it’s different this time, but let’s compare anyway.

“Tryin’ hard to recreate what had yet to be created” is almost as dangerous as trying to pretend that something that has been created isn’t being recreated. Does this mean that PE ratios can’t go higher? No. They did in ’99 as well as ’21.  

The Shiller P/E 10 ratio (right) is also back in territory rarely seen before. Now that we are hitting new highs in the stock market, it should temper anyone who may get overly enthusiastic about leaning too much on returns going forward.  

“Anybody else would surely know” - This chart shows the Shiller P/E 10 ratio at 36, over double the mean, and however you view this, it looks high.      

Instinct: What do we see that “the sentimental fool don’t see”?

The dangers of performance concentration, towering national debt, election year uncertainty, demographic stress, and of course, the Fed, all seem to be narratives that are easily ignored.

First, let’s look at the national debt. Ever since TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Programs) rescue plans from 2009 (remember when we just HAD to save AIG and the auto industry?), the debt has gone up and up. COVID was just another chapter, as we saw COVID stimulus checks and then the Inflation Reduction Act.

Can we handle the next chapter, or does this need for government to save the economy need to end?

And speaking of saving the economy, the Fed continues to be another government character masquerading as the savior of capitalism. Even though rates came down quickly in 2000 and 2008, the stock market didn’t seem to get the memo and fell sharply each time. It was September 18, 2007 and September 18, 2024 when the Fed cut rates by 50 basis points. Ben Bernanke, like Jay Powell today, assured us that they are simply providing liquidity. Housing was the bubble issue then. Is Artificial Intelligence pricing the bubble now?  

The arrows tell the story of a Federal Reserve, like the great and powerful Wizard of Oz, that once you pull back the curtain, doesn’t have any special insight or knowledge. In other words, there is no smoothness to this line, and no real ability to steer the economy. So maybe it’s time to change the phrase form “Don’t fight the Fed” to “Don’t believe the Fed” because…

But what a fool believes, he sees

No wise man has the power to reason away

What seems to be is always better than nothing

Than nothing at all

[1] Kenny Loggins & Michael McDonald. (1978). What a Fool Believes [Song]. On Nightwatch. Columbia Records.

This blog should not be copied, distributed, published or reproduced, in whole or in part. All economic and market forecasts are as of the date of distribution. Oak City Consulting is not providing any financial, economic, legal, accounting, or tax advice or recommendations in this blog. The information contained in this blog does not constitute investment advice or an offer to buy or sell securities from Oak City Consulting to the reader and should not be relied upon to evaluate any potential transaction. In addition, the receipt of this blog by any reader is not to be taken to constitute such person a client of Oak City Consulting. Oak City Consulting makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the statements or any information contained in this blog and any liability therefore (including in respect of direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage) is expressly disclaimed.

Previous
Previous

Some Thoughts for the New Year

Next
Next

It Came Upon the Markets Now